<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/css/rss20.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:pheedo="http://www.pheedo.com/namespace/pheedo">
	<channel>
		<title>InformationWeek Open Source Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/</link>
		<description>Here you&apos;ll find observations, anecdotes, and analysis from our experienced staff of reporters and editors, with links to stories, surveys and other content that appear on InformationWeek.com, TechWeb.com, and many other points on the Web. We welcome discussion, and invite you to share your opinions and thoughts. Please participate with us!</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:33:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.14</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<item>
			<title>Be Transparent To The (Open) Core</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>"Transparency" is a vital term in open source: how easy is it to find out about some aspect of an open source project or product? Matthew Aslett of the 451 CAOS Theory blog went to find out how a number of vendors of open core products stacked up in this regard.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=d7f44523c77f2514ba475cbe68e21ec2&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=d7f44523c77f2514ba475cbe68e21ec2&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=d7f44523c77f2514ba475cbe68e21ec2</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/be_transparent.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/be_transparent.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:33:24 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Google&apos;s New Chrome OS Partner: Ubuntu</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Among the people Google's partnering with to build Chrome OS, there's now a very familiar name: Canonical, the folks behind Ubuntu. In their words: "Canonical is contributing engineering to Google under contract" (for Chrome OS).</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=87139f32846d6489e9409cbf96d5c074&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=87139f32846d6489e9409cbf96d5c074&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=87139f32846d6489e9409cbf96d5c074</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/googles_new_chr.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/googles_new_chr.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:58:04 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Proprietary Software: Still Not Doomed, Sorry</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>These days, I can scarcely click a mouse without running headlong into some variety of punditry regarding the imminent death of proprietary software thanks to open source. Sorry, I don't believe proprietary software is digging its inevitable collective grave any more than the sun is about to go nova.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=40b34252888d75203ab5baca076b20cd&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=40b34252888d75203ab5baca076b20cd&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=40b34252888d75203ab5baca076b20cd</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/proprietary_sof.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/proprietary_sof.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:50:27 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Keep Cool Over Open Source License Violations</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Shortly before I wrote my post about responsible disclosure of open source licensing violations, <a href="http://ebb.org/bkuhn/" target="_blank">Bradley Kuhn</a> (of the <a href="http://conservancy.softwarefreedom.org/" target="_blank">Software Freedom Conservancy</a> and <a href="http://www.softwarefreedom.org/" target="_blank">Software Freedom Law Center</a>) wrote a <a href="http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2009/11/08/gpl-enforcement.html" target="_blank">post of his own</a> about the same subject. His take: GPL violations are common, everyday things -- and as such should be handled with cool, calm, and collected heads.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<hr />
<div style="font-size:xx-small;color:gray;padding-bottom:.5em">InformationWeek's RSS Feed is brought to you by</div>
<div><a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/feeds/ht.php?t=c&amp;i=fc5d162c25b393ddf1159c4d2deae06e&amp;p=1">NEC</a></div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr><td valign="top"><object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/34448608001?isVid=1&publisherID=1660622131" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="@videoPlayer=34442231001&playerID=34448608001&domain=embed&" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/34448608001?isVid=1&publisherID=1660622131" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="@videoPlayer=34442231001&playerID=34448608001&domain=embed&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="300" height="250" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"HSPACE=10 align="left" /></embed></object><br /><a href="http://www.nec.com/global/cases/rms/?cid=bn58" target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pheedo.com/g/nec/videologo.png" border="0" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td>&nbsp;</td></tr>
</table>
<div style="font-size:xx-small; padding-top: 1em;"><span style="border-top: 1px solid">
<br style="display:none"/>
<a href="http://www.pheedo.com/">Ads by Pheedo</a>
</span><img alt="" style="border: 0; height: 1px; width: 1px;" border="0" height="1" width="1" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/feeds/ht.php?t=v&amp;i=fc5d162c25b393ddf1159c4d2deae06e&amp;p=1"/>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/><br/>
</div>
]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=fc5d162c25b393ddf1159c4d2deae06e</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/keeping_a_cool.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/keeping_a_cool.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:02:06 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Google Chrome OS Unveiled: Nothing But The Web</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Today Google aired a webcast where they whipped the curtains all the way off Google Chrome OS for the first time. It's about what most people expected: Chrome OS running on top of a thin layer of Linux, designed for netbooks -- and designed for people whose sole computing experience is the web. It's Google's netbook answer to Android. <br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=f76a50140801ff61cea1175d572d52d0&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=f76a50140801ff61cea1175d572d52d0&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=f76a50140801ff61cea1175d572d52d0</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/google_chrome_o_2.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/google_chrome_o_2.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<pheedo:origEnclosureLink>http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2723/4118119492_2930875d46.jpg</pheedo:origEnclosureLink>
			<enclosure url="http://www.pheedo.com/e/9ccb9eb6f2ca1e492f15936d6c2f1819/4118119492_2930875d46.jpg" length="86595" type="image/jpeg"/>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Open Government: A San Francisco Treat</title>
			<author>Fritz Nelson</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.datasf.org/">DataSF.org</a> is San Francisco's major foray into open and transparent government; it is the city giving its vital data back to its citizens. We talked with the city's mayor, Gavin Newsom, several members of his technology team, led by CTO Blair Adams, and some of the early developers who have already built applications around the data. We've captured all of this in a new video documentary.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=6595dff8baacb9199e265ec058626b4e&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=6595dff8baacb9199e265ec058626b4e&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=6595dff8baacb9199e265ec058626b4e</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/open_government_1.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/open_government_1.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Full Nelson</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:14:07 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Trouble With Movable Type 5</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I've been using <a href="http://www.movabletype.org">Movable Type</a> as my blogging system of choice for several years now -- not just because it's open source but because it's a good program with great features. And yet the newest revision, version 5, feels like it falls far short of what could -- and needs -- to be done.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=0ad73fc1320b1e87cb368c9713493859&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=0ad73fc1320b1e87cb368c9713493859&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=0ad73fc1320b1e87cb368c9713493859</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/the_trouble_wit_2.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/the_trouble_wit_2.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:46:17 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Linux&apos;s Future: Google?</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Laugh (or cry) if you want. But with each successive release of Android, and with each new iteration of Chrome -- soon to be ChromeOS -- it's looking more and more like Linux's future as any kind of mainstream product is in Google's hands. There's a lesson here.</p>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=76b5fa9b0b616bbbf8ebd3a52a37084e&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=76b5fa9b0b616bbbf8ebd3a52a37084e&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=76b5fa9b0b616bbbf8ebd3a52a37084e</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/linuxs_future_g.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/linuxs_future_g.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:02:09 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Let&apos;s Have Responsible Disclosure For Open Source Violations</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week brought news about Microsoft <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/microsofts_gpl.html">inadvertently using open source code</a> in one of their binary-only tools -- code that had to be redistributed with the tool itself. When this does happen, what's the best way to bring such a mistake to an offending company's attention? Is shouting about it far and wide always wise?</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=c3adf0a6bbfcbac6d918546634e93ea6&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=c3adf0a6bbfcbac6d918546634e93ea6&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=c3adf0a6bbfcbac6d918546634e93ea6</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/lets_have_respo.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/lets_have_respo.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:18:22 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Communities Vs. Teams: Open Source Needs Both</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A curious insight has come from all the recent talk about MySQL / Sun / Oracle. People talk about a community <em>around </em>a given open source product, but there's at least as much talk about a team <em>within </em>it. Let's not neglect the importance of either of those things.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=3f44cc2d8d02d97482323d7548a8a76f&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=3f44cc2d8d02d97482323d7548a8a76f&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=3f44cc2d8d02d97482323d7548a8a76f</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/communities_vs.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/communities_vs.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:53:11 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Amazon Bids For Windows Developers On Eve Of Azure&apos;s Launch</title>
			<author>Charles Babcock</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Four days before Microsoft launches its Azure cloud platform to developers at a conference in L.A., Amazon has come up with a .Net software development kit to help Windows developers produce code that runs in Amazon's EC2. It's probably just coincidence. But let's see what they're getting with AWS SDK for .Net.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=46915ddbd70b65cba76984afa281655d&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=46915ddbd70b65cba76984afa281655d&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=46915ddbd70b65cba76984afa281655d</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/amazon_bids_for.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/amazon_bids_for.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Cloud Computing</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:35:37 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does Microsoft&apos;s &apos;Sudo Patent&apos; Protect User Account Control?</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Has Microsoft gone one step closer to patenting the words "May I?" That's been the general sentiment about the granting of Microsoft's "Rights elevator" patent -- which would cover User Account Control ("UAC") in Vista and Windows 7, but possibly also the generic <strong>sudo </strong>command in Unix.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=e1c7a342a5e32ff7cd37cfa076f597f2&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=e1c7a342a5e32ff7cd37cfa076f597f2&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=e1c7a342a5e32ff7cd37cfa076f597f2</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/does_microsofts_2.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/does_microsofts_2.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:49:45 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Why Google&apos;s Go Might Be A No-Go</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>After news of Google's <a href="http://golang.org/" target="_blank">Go language</a> surfaced, I went to my programmer friend for some additional perspective on Google's new experiment. He wasn't impressed -- and actually, neither was I. We had different reasons.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=a535a921c47db550bad3e15f95284f99&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=a535a921c47db550bad3e15f95284f99&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=a535a921c47db550bad3e15f95284f99</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/why_googles_go.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/why_googles_go.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:14:19 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Here&apos;s What&apos;s Different About &apos;The Cloud&apos;</title>
			<author>Charles Babcock</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What's different about cloud computing versus the forms of computing that have gone before? It's really just a matter of scale, isn't it? The Google or Amazon.com or eBay data centers are maybe a little bigger than a big enterprise data center, right? Wrong. One answer lies in an example like Hadoop.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<hr />
<div style="font-size:xx-small;color:gray;padding-bottom:.5em">InformationWeek's RSS Feed is brought to you by</div>
<div><a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/feeds/ht.php?t=c&amp;i=9d9899c5e7ff3fa9a2f8c98d33128980&amp;p=1">NEC</a></div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr><td valign="top"><object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/34448608001?isVid=1&publisherID=1660622131" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="@videoPlayer=34442231001&playerID=34448608001&domain=embed&" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/34448608001?isVid=1&publisherID=1660622131" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="@videoPlayer=34442231001&playerID=34448608001&domain=embed&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="300" height="250" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"HSPACE=10 align="left" /></embed></object><br /><a href="http://www.nec.com/global/cases/rms/?cid=bn58" target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pheedo.com/g/nec/videologo.png" border="0" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td>&nbsp;</td></tr>
</table>
<div style="font-size:xx-small; padding-top: 1em;"><span style="border-top: 1px solid">
<br style="display:none"/>
<a href="http://www.pheedo.com/">Ads by Pheedo</a>
</span><img alt="" style="border: 0; height: 1px; width: 1px;" border="0" height="1" width="1" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/feeds/ht.php?t=v&amp;i=9d9899c5e7ff3fa9a2f8c98d33128980&amp;p=1"/>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/><br/>
</div>
]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=9d9899c5e7ff3fa9a2f8c98d33128980</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/heres_whats_dif.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/heres_whats_dif.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Cloud Computing</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:46:52 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Miguel de Icaza And Mono: Platform-Agnostic Programming Power</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Few names in open source are at the level of a household name, but Miguel de Icaza, of Novell's Mono, comes close. Last week I had the good fortune to chat with him for a bit about MonoTools, the new Mono development package for Microsoft Visual Studio -- and about why Mono attracts such bitterness from open source purists.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=b55dfa1fe6b2f844740757793e08a861&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=b55dfa1fe6b2f844740757793e08a861&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=b55dfa1fe6b2f844740757793e08a861</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/miguel_de_icaza_1.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/miguel_de_icaza_1.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:01:42 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A Litl Redux</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>After my <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/too_much_for_to.html" target="_blank">Thursday column</a> about the l<a href="http://litl.com/" target="_blank">itl</a>, readers pointed my attention to a <a href="http://litl.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/thinking-of-a-netbook-id-rather-buy-a-litl-let-me-explain/" target="_blank">blog post</a> where the folks at litl (all lowercase) further defended their reasons for its rather top-heavy $700 price point. I went in expecting some real meat for discussion. I came away with a nearly empty plate.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=1fa4ad71095694667c0e76bf4ddc3986&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=1fa4ad71095694667c0e76bf4ddc3986&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=1fa4ad71095694667c0e76bf4ddc3986</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/a_litl_redux.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/a_litl_redux.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:18:59 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Open Source You Can Use, November Edition</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this edition: two ways to browse the web, and one great way to find everything scattered across all your storage media. Read on. </p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=f8e54a303d3240ceee60637f4c95a365&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=f8e54a303d3240ceee60637f4c95a365&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=f8e54a303d3240ceee60637f4c95a365</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/open_source_you_8.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/open_source_you_8.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:20:36 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A Boston-based startup named <a href="http://litl.com" target="_blank">Litl</a> is taking a big risk: they're betting people will go for a netbook that sports a Linux-based OS and focuses on Web-/network-based productivity (Facebook, Twitter, etc.). The risk is in the pricetag: $700 -- almost twice the price of computers that can do twice as much. Is there a market for this?</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=7737276746408247d125255a5fe59fdb&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=7737276746408247d125255a5fe59fdb&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=7737276746408247d125255a5fe59fdb</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/too_much_for_to.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/too_much_for_to.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:15:56 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/linux_awol_from.html">my colleague Alex Wolfe noted</a>, Linux hasn't made a dent in the desktop after years in the wild. The climb looks all the steeper now that Windows 7 and new versions of Mac OS X have arrived. I can think of a few other reasons why Linux hasn't achieved more than a fractional marketshare with end users, and they aren't pretty. (I've already donned my asbestos suit.)</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=770b5ff3ddc5e53839bad8963ebff16c&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=770b5ff3ddc5e53839bad8963ebff16c&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=770b5ff3ddc5e53839bad8963ebff16c</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/more_reasons_wh.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/more_reasons_wh.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:52:34 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>OpenOffice: Go Open Core</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Oracle's acquisition of Sun is still grinding along, but while the gears are still turning I'd like to throw in a request: Make OpenOffice an open-core product. Keep the main program free, but charge for the useful bonuses.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=f3e64c6495b874eeb2fe048f315b1151&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=f3e64c6495b874eeb2fe048f315b1151&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=f3e64c6495b874eeb2fe048f315b1151</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/openoffice_go_o.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/openoffice_go_o.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:23:36 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>One FatELF Binary To Run Them All</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Even Linux's advocates are unthrilled at one of its sticking points: binaries built for one breed of Linux don't always run on another. And since unifying Linux into a common distribution is about as likely as herding a circus ring full of cats into a clown car, people who want to distribute prebuilt binaries for Linux have few choices. Here's a new choice: FatELF, or universal binaries for Linux.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=048c81bca9a7bf91eadc403c66ed73ff&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=048c81bca9a7bf91eadc403c66ed73ff&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=048c81bca9a7bf91eadc403c66ed73ff</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/one_fatelf_bina.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/11/one_fatelf_bina.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:55:04 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Amazon Serves Up MySQL</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Amazon's newest cloud offering: MySQL 5.1 in the cloud, also known as <a href="http://aws.amazon.com/rds/">Amazon RDS</a>. And there's worry that it'll turn out to be a bad thing for MySQL in the long run, although that might not hold true for other open source repurposed in the same way.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=4491450290bcf49bafcd63e5afcc55f4&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=4491450290bcf49bafcd63e5afcc55f4&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=4491450290bcf49bafcd63e5afcc55f4</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/10/amazon_serves_u.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/10/amazon_serves_u.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:25:21 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ksplice: No More Reboots?</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>How'd you like to never have to reboot a Linux box again -- no, not even if you have to apply a kernel-level patch? That's the promise of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ksplice.com/">Ksplice</a>, a software technology for Linux (and maybe soon other platforms) designed to allow a system to be patched from the kernel level on up without having to be restarted. It's available right now for Ubuntu, and from what I can see, it's not digital snake oil.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=a9584634304defeb1b3afe32d7b94f2e&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=a9584634304defeb1b3afe32d7b94f2e&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=a9584634304defeb1b3afe32d7b94f2e</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/10/ksplice_no_more.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/10/ksplice_no_more.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:12:32 -0500</pubDate>
			<pheedo:origEnclosureLink>http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2563/4055767236_5baed8880d.jpg</pheedo:origEnclosureLink>
			<enclosure url="http://www.pheedo.com/e/861d20cb288b060a931bd0e3a5f3fd1c/4055767236_5baed8880d.jpg" length="83546" type="image/jpeg"/>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DOD Says Yes To More Open Source</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Open source in the government and military isn't a new thing; governance is one of open source's biggest target markets, so to speak. It's still all the more heartening to hear the Department of Defense come out strongly in favor of open source, and to recommend using more of it whenever possible.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=c29de7c754bdd48bd124198906372ee9&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=c29de7c754bdd48bd124198906372ee9&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=c29de7c754bdd48bd124198906372ee9</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/10/dod_says_yes_to.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/10/dod_says_yes_to.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:29:23 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ubuntu&apos;s Future Shouldn&apos;t Be This Unpredictable</title>
			<author>Serdar Yegulalp</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Canonical's Mark Shuttleworth held a phone conference to talk about the state of Ubuntu. It's clearly become more than just "Linux for human beings". But it's getting harder to avoid thinking of Canonical as a black box, and that hurts.</p><br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=6efc5c18b79bf9e9d08a38f235a8ec0c&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=6efc5c18b79bf9e9d08a38f235a8ec0c&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2225"/>]]></description>
			<link>http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=6efc5c18b79bf9e9d08a38f235a8ec0c</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/10/ubuntus_future.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/10/ubuntus_future.html?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_ALL</guid>
			<category>Open Source</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:23:22 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>